Sunday, May 17, 2015

Tom Brady isn't the only one that should fear deflation—the economy should too

Tom Brady isn't the only one that should fear deflation—the economy should too

      
The specter of deflation is haunting more than New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady. The whole U.S. economy is now grappling with its effects.


As growth splutters, the world's largest economy is facing the real possibility of a spiral in prices. On Thursday, the Producer Price Index for Final Demand showed that prices fell by 0.4 percent in April compared to March, and by 1.3 percent versus last April. The readings according to the previous-used PPI data series, known as PPI for finished goods, looked even worse, with a monster 4.4 percent year-over-year drop.




Steep price drops can be perilous for the growth of an economy that's comprised of nearly 2/3 consumer spending. While falling prices may sounds attractive from a consumer standpoint, they are bad for the overall economy since deflation encourages people to save, rather than spend, money. After all, why spend a dollar today when it will be worth the equivalent of $1.05 tomorrow?
However—and perhaps unlike the Patriots' embattled quarterback—the U.S. has a good excuse for the potential deflationary shock: Oil.

Crude's slide over the past year has reduced macro price metrics tremendously. And indeed, when energy and food prices are stripped out to produce what's known as the "core inflation" measure, PPI for Finished Goods actually rose by 2 percent over the course of the year. On the other hand, the core PPI for Final Demand number still fell 0.2 percent from March to April.
Simultaneously, some maintain that no matter how noisy the inflation reading may be, there are still bad signs embedded in it.


"The PPI came in well below expectations and trying to pin the drop in wholesale prices on any one component would be a mistake," wrote Steven Ricchiuto, Mizuho's unconventional chief economist. "The loss of upside momentum in prices is broad-based."

Headaches for the Fed?

Sale Pending real estate home prices
Getty Images

For Ricchiuto, the number also points to a headache for the Federal Reserve in its quest to raise short-term rates. The central bank has set an inflation target of 2 percent, and no matter what the actual inflation number is, 2 percent does appear to be elusive at this point.
This despite years of ultra-loose monetary policy, which theoretically should spur inflation by making it more attractive to spend rather than save money. If inflation does not pick up, the Fed may not see fit to raise rates.


"The PPI fits with my later-rather-than-sooner Fed call, and further supports my call for a sustained trading range on 10-year notes," Ricchiuto wrote.
That is, a delay in the Fed's rate-hiking plans would mean that Treasury bonds can stay put, instead of trading much lower as yields rise.
The key event for inflation-watchers will come on Friday, when April Consumer Price Index data is released. Economists are looking for inflation of just 0.1 percent, and 0.2 percent ex- food and energy.


But those more bullish than Ricchiuto, such as RBC senior economic Jacob Oubina, say that the April inflation reading should mark the "bottom" for inflation, with core inflation "grinding up" to 2 percent by year-end.


Oubina says that shelter makes up 42 percent of CPI, and since rental real estate "will continue to be in high demand, that alone will support the inflation backdrop as we make our way through the balance of 2015."


PPI is often used to forecast CPI, given that those produced goods will, in theory, be sold to consumers in the future. Yet the weak April reading doesn't spook the RBC economist, largely because it is such a "frustratingly volatile" economic reading.
"Energy and trade services alone pulled this index down. So the pass-through argument just doesn't pass the smell test," he said.
—By CNBC's Alex Rosenberg.

Monday, May 4, 2015

4 ways to outlive your retirement savings

4 ways to outlive your retirement savings


Ever wake up in cold sweat at night wondering whether you'll outlive your retirement savings? You're not alone.

Many Americans have spent too much and saved too little, and traditional defined-benefit pensions have gone the way of the fax machine, displaced by 401(k) plans with modest balances.
The median 401(k) plan balance for two-person households nearing retirement (age 55 to 64) is about $111,000, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. To some, that may seem like a big nest egg, but it equates to less than $400 per month during retirement, assuming a yearly withdrawal rate of 4 percent, adjusted for inflation.



Don Klumpp | Photographer's Choice | Getty Images
To make matters worse, half of today's private-sector workers don't have any employer-sponsored retirement plan at their current jobs, according to the book "Falling Short: The Coming Retirement Crisis and What to Do About It," by Charles D. Ellis, Alicia H. Munnell and Andrew D. Eschtruth. Many of us will need more income during retirement than did previous generations, due to longer life expectancies and rising health-care costs.

"The fundamental problem," when it comes to retirement, "is that most people don't have much in the way of savings," said Anthony Webb, a senior research economist at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. "The solution to not having enough is to have a boatload of money. The question is: How do you acquire a boatload of money?"

If you are off-track when it comes to retirement savings, the obvious solution is to begin stashing away a huge percentage of your income, Webb said. But many people in their 40s and 50s are unwilling or unable to make that kind of sacrifice, he added. So then what?
Here are some ideas to consider:

1. Delay retirement. Retirement-planning experts say it behooves us to resist the temptation to call it quits in our early 60s, provided we don't have very physically taxing jobs. Putting off retirement has several potential benefits. It means more time to save and invest and, for better or worse, a shorter life expectancy during retirement.
"If you can work longer, for many people that will be a more palatable solution than saving a crazy percentage of your salary," Webb said.
Working longer also allows you to wait to claim Social Security retirement benefits.
Typically, the longer you wait to claim benefits, the bigger your monthly payments will be, up until age 70. Those who claim benefits at age 70 get a whopping 76 percent more per month than they would if they began drawing benefits at age 62, according to the book "Falling Short: The Coming Retirement Crisis and What to Do About It."

Many people draw Social Security benefits early, figuring they might not live long enough to make a higher monthly payout worth the wait. But that calculus can be problematic, because nobody knows exactly when they'll die, said David Mendels, a certified financial planner and director of planning at Creative Financial Concepts.
"You might die before your life expectancy, and if you do and you claimed early, you made the right call—and congratulations," he quipped. "But if you live longer than your life expectancy, you might end up eating cat food in your old age."


2. Redefine retirement. "Retirement used to be a reward for 40 years of drudgery," said Frank Boucher, a CFP and owner of Boucher Financial Planning Services. "Folks would die shortly after they retired, but that's usually not the case anymore."
Many of us will spend a couple decades in retirement, which gives us ample opportunity to engage in interesting and/or rewarding activities. For many people, that might entail some sort of post-retirement work, Boucher said. Part-time work allows retirees to put off tapping their nest eggs or draw down savings more slowly. Those who are self-employed are also eligible for related tax deductions.
Boucher is living by his own advice. Tired of traveling for work and wanting a change, he retired in 2006 from a national association providing financial education and planning services and started his own practice.
"You can really enhance your retirement finances by focusing on the things you are passionate about and getting paid to do them," he said. "A lot of people actually enjoy the work they do, but not the environment they do it in."

3. Look into buying an immediate annuity to hedge the risk you'll outlive your assets. Immediate annuities, sometimes called income or payout annuities, are pretty straightforward. Basically, you hand over a lump sum to an insurer in return for guaranteed regular payments for a period of time, say 10 or 20 years, or until you die. The payments may be fixed or increase with the cost of living, which helps counter inflation risk.
"Remember that you aren't investing for just the next five years. You are also investing for 20 years from now." -David Mendels, director of planning at Creative Financial Concepts
Sellers of these annuities are essentially redistributing income from contract owners that die relatively young to those who live a long life, said Webb at the Center for Retirement Research. So why part with a chunk of money when you run the risk of falling into the first camp? The rationale, Webb said, is similar to the reason people buy homeowner's insurance: Your house may not burn down, but if it does, you'll be glad you had insurance.

4. Don't ignore inflation and interest-rate risks. One of the biggest dilemmas many older Americans face is how to invest their savings. Mendels at Creative Financial Concepts says it's important to keep in mind that all investments carry risk and that it's okay to take some stock-market risk to help counter the real possibility that inflation will erode your spending power during retirement. Many retirees, he said, wrongly focus exclusively on income-generating investments, which can be volatile, too.
"Retirees jump through these hoops in an effort to generate more income and get into riskier and narrower stuff when they should be focused on total return as opposed to yield," Mendels said.
It is important, he added, to have a long-term perspective and "remember that you aren't investing for just the next five years. You are also investing for 20 years from now."

—By Anna Robaton, special to CNBC.com

Insurance you'll still need in retirement

Insurance you'll still need in retirement

Once you're retired, you typically don't need disability or life insurance to replace your wages. You'll be living off other sources of income: your savings, any pensions, Social Security (with some exceptions -- more on that in a moment).

However, you really need to keep some policies in place even after you quit working. These include:
Liability insurance. You don't want to get to retirement only to be wiped out by an unexpected lawsuit. Liability coverage pays the costs if you cause an accident, your dog bites someone or you're otherwise found at fault for injury. Financial planners typically recommend having liability coverage at least equal to your net worth and preferably twice your net worth.
Trial attorneys will typically settle for the amount of your coverage if you're adequately insured. If you're not, they'll be motivated to go after your other assets. Your retirement savings are safe from creditors' claims, but other assets -- including some or all of your home equity, depending on state law -- are up for grabs.

Liability is part of your auto and homeowners' insurance, but the limits on your coverage may be too low. If so, consider adding an umbrella or personal liability policy that kicks in once your other coverage is exhausted. The first $1 million of coverage typically costs around $300 a year, with the next million costing about $75 and a third million $50, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

Health insurance. Medicare provides health insurance for the vast majority of people 65 and over, but the federal government program covers only about 60 percent of retirees' health care costs, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Health care spending eats up 15 percent of the typical Medicare recipient's household spending, and EBRI calculates that a 65-year-old couple with median drug expenses would need $234,000 in savings just to have a 50 percent chance of having enough to cover health care costs in retirement.
If you don't have employer or retiree health insurance to supplement Medicare, you might want to consider buying one of 10 available Medigap plans offered by private insurers.
If you're under 65 and don't have health insurance from another source, you can buy an individual policy. If you can qualify for a government subsidy (and most people can), you should shop through an Obamacare exchange -- your state's version, if it provides one, or the federal exchange. Under Obamacare, everyone can get coverage -- you can't be denied or charged more because of preexisting conditions.
Disaster insurance. Even if you haven't quite got your mortgage paid off, chances are you have substantial equity in your home. Your home's value likely is a major part of your wealth and may be a resource you can tap in the future to fund your retirement.
But your homeowners' insurance may not offer enough protection. It doesn't cover floods, for example, or earthquakes in areas at high risk for those disasters. While homeowners' policies typically cover wind damage, you may need separate coverage to protect against hurricanes.
Disaster polices often come with high deductibles, so make sure you have enough cash set aside in an emergency fund to cover those.

Some other coverage you might want to consider:

Long-term care insurance. Medicare doesn't cover most nursing home or other "custodial care" expenses if you're not able to take care of yourself. The cost of long-term care can be astronomical, but so can the cost of insurance to pay for it. The best time to buy this coverage, if you can afford it, is in your mid-50s, according to the American Association of Long-Term Care Insurance and many financial planners.

If you're interested, look for an independent insurance professional who specializes in helping people compare policies. Also consider consulting a fee-only financial planner to make sure it's the right fit.
Life insurance. You need coverage if you still have people financially dependent on you, such as minor, special-needs children or a spouse who wouldn't be able to pay the bills if you died. You also may want a policy if your estate is so large that it would owe estate taxes (currently, estates worth more than $5.43 million). If that's the case, talk to an estate-planning attorney who can help you minimize taxes and find appropriate coverage.

Liz Weston

Liz Weston is an award-winning personal finance columnist and the author of several books, including the best-selling "Your Credit Score." Liz has appeared on "The Dr. Phil Show," "NBC Nightly News," "The Today Show" and CNBC, among other programs. She's on Twitter and Facebook and blogs at AskLizWeston.com